In 2014, I released 3 very different books, one through a traditional publisher, one through a kickstarter effort, and one that was a compilation of previously published Julius Katz mysteries (with a new novella added for good measure).
The Interloper was my kickstarter project. Earlier I had written two ultra-hardboiled novellas, The Hunted and The Dame, that were a mix of government conspiracy and Richard Stark-like crime heists. and readers, especially Richard Stark fans, seemed to like them, so I decided to write a third one, The Interloper (with this one more the size of a Gold Medal-type novel) and then tie all them together as a single novel.
The Boy Who Killed Demons is my 4th novel published by Overlook Press, and this one is somewhere between horror and fantasy. Written as a journal by a 15 year-old kid who decides he needs to save the world from demons, this book is lighter and with more sarcastic humor than my other books. It's also written for both new adult readers (16 and up) and adults.
I previously had my Julius Katz stories divided up among different ebooks, but with two more stories published earlier in 2014 by Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine, I decided to clean this up and put all 6 of them in one collection, while also writing a brand new Julius Katz novella for it. These are charming, lighthearted mysteries, although with a hardboiled edge, featuring my brilliant and very eccentric Boston detective, Julius Katz, and his erstwhile sidekick, Archie. So far these stories have won a Shamus, Derringer, and 2 Ellery Queen Readers Choice awards, and more stories will be coming soon in Ellery Queen.
Saturday, December 27, 2014
Wednesday, December 24, 2014
Thanks Wolfe Pack!
I'd like to thank the Wolfe Pack for their endorsement of The Julius Katz Collection!
"A brilliant, eccentric detective who loves food with an assistant named Archie. Sound familiar? It should, and it's obviously intentional. There are other similarities to Rex Stout's Nero Wolf series in these stories, including a masterful writing style...."
"A brilliant, eccentric detective who loves food with an assistant named Archie. Sound familiar? It should, and it's obviously intentional. There are other similarities to Rex Stout's Nero Wolf series in these stories, including a masterful writing style...."
Monday, December 22, 2014
A Killer Review From The Past
With PulpMaster releasing Killer in Germany, I thought I'd bring back Ed Siegel's review of Killer which ran in the Boston Globe:
Dave Zeltserman is at it again writing about ex-con antiheroes with the
kind of panache that would make Jim Thompson, king of the psycho killer
novels, proud. In fact, there's more than a passing resemblance to
Thompson's classic, "The Killer Inside Me."
Even Thompson might be taken aback, though, by the matter-of-factness with which Zeltserman gets inside the head of Leonard March, just released from jail 14 years after cutting a deal to turn state's evidence on a Mafia boss who assigned him a couple dozen hits. It isn't until after the DA grants him immunity, though, that the full scope of the March madness comes out.
As the story picks up, in Waltham of all places, March is trying to go straight. He's working a menial janitorial job, trying unsuccessfully to forge a relationship with his children while grieving about his wife's death, and making a virtue of his working-class lifestyle. He's even more sympathetic than the protagonists of Zeltserman's previous ex-con books, "Small Crimes" and "Pariah." He can't even bring himself to kill the mouse that's scurrying around his apartment.
The problem is that nobody else intends to let him get away with mass murder. Not the hoods. Not the media. Not the public. And certainly not the beautiful woman who wants to write the 62-year-old's biography.
And what about you, dear reader? Are you going to let March get away with it or fall prey to Zeltserman's seductive story? It isn't so much that the Needham writer elicits sympathy, though he certainly does. March prevents the robbery of a liquor store and a possible homicide or two. He stands up to a macho abuser. We don't forgive him for past sins, but he seems to loathe himself more than we do. The affect is similar to Mickey Rourke's in "The Wrestler" a world-weariness that still holds the possibility of redemption.
This is only part of what's going on, though. The point isn't to elicit sympathy, but to get inside the mind of a murderer, to see the world as he sees it. A life of crime seemed to be the logical career move for a half-Jewish kid in a Catholic neighborhood who was better with his fists than his schoolwork. Add an unhealthy dose of amorality, a sprinkle of psychopathology, and voila.
Even that doesn't really address what makes "Killer" seem so, sorry, dead-on. More than in his previous books, Zeltserman makes a virtue out of the spareness of his writing. Other noir writers try to emulate the purpleness of Raymond Chandler's prose or the toughness of any number of crime writers. Zeltserman is content to let the narrative flow uninterrupted. As the story shifts from present to past, the precision of March's observations, even when he's fooling himself, drives the action on a steady path without a hint of cliche or sentimentality.
Zeltserman could be even more precise. When March reads a book or goes to a movie, why not tell us what they are? Maybe Zeltserman's saying that it doesn't matter; they're only ways for March to kill time. Still, I sometimes wish his characters would stop and smell the cordite.
That's a minor cavil, though. It might be considered something of a guilty pleasure to walk on the wild side with Zeltserman's killers. But there's no need to think of the pleasure as guilty anymore than the characters think of themselves as guilty. Their days at the office are bloodier than ours, but sometimes that's the only difference. That we neither celebrate nor condemn March is the unsolved mystery of the book and what gives "Killer" its special kick.
Even Thompson might be taken aback, though, by the matter-of-factness with which Zeltserman gets inside the head of Leonard March, just released from jail 14 years after cutting a deal to turn state's evidence on a Mafia boss who assigned him a couple dozen hits. It isn't until after the DA grants him immunity, though, that the full scope of the March madness comes out.
As the story picks up, in Waltham of all places, March is trying to go straight. He's working a menial janitorial job, trying unsuccessfully to forge a relationship with his children while grieving about his wife's death, and making a virtue of his working-class lifestyle. He's even more sympathetic than the protagonists of Zeltserman's previous ex-con books, "Small Crimes" and "Pariah." He can't even bring himself to kill the mouse that's scurrying around his apartment.
The problem is that nobody else intends to let him get away with mass murder. Not the hoods. Not the media. Not the public. And certainly not the beautiful woman who wants to write the 62-year-old's biography.
And what about you, dear reader? Are you going to let March get away with it or fall prey to Zeltserman's seductive story? It isn't so much that the Needham writer elicits sympathy, though he certainly does. March prevents the robbery of a liquor store and a possible homicide or two. He stands up to a macho abuser. We don't forgive him for past sins, but he seems to loathe himself more than we do. The affect is similar to Mickey Rourke's in "The Wrestler" a world-weariness that still holds the possibility of redemption.
This is only part of what's going on, though. The point isn't to elicit sympathy, but to get inside the mind of a murderer, to see the world as he sees it. A life of crime seemed to be the logical career move for a half-Jewish kid in a Catholic neighborhood who was better with his fists than his schoolwork. Add an unhealthy dose of amorality, a sprinkle of psychopathology, and voila.
Even that doesn't really address what makes "Killer" seem so, sorry, dead-on. More than in his previous books, Zeltserman makes a virtue out of the spareness of his writing. Other noir writers try to emulate the purpleness of Raymond Chandler's prose or the toughness of any number of crime writers. Zeltserman is content to let the narrative flow uninterrupted. As the story shifts from present to past, the precision of March's observations, even when he's fooling himself, drives the action on a steady path without a hint of cliche or sentimentality.
Zeltserman could be even more precise. When March reads a book or goes to a movie, why not tell us what they are? Maybe Zeltserman's saying that it doesn't matter; they're only ways for March to kill time. Still, I sometimes wish his characters would stop and smell the cordite.
That's a minor cavil, though. It might be considered something of a guilty pleasure to walk on the wild side with Zeltserman's killers. But there's no need to think of the pleasure as guilty anymore than the characters think of themselves as guilty. Their days at the office are bloodier than ours, but sometimes that's the only difference. That we neither celebrate nor condemn March is the unsolved mystery of the book and what gives "Killer" its special kick.
Sunday, December 21, 2014
Thursday, December 11, 2014
10 Reasons to get The Julius Katz Collection
10 reasons why you should want to get this 7-story, 350 page collection of Julius Katz detective stories:
1) Shamus and Derringer award-winning 'Julius Katz'
2) Ellery Queen's Readers Choice Award-winner 'Archie's Been Framed'
3) Ellery Queen's Readers Choice Award-winner 'Archie Solves the Case'
4) Never before published novella 'Julius Katz and the Case of a Sliced Ham'
5) From Publisher's Weekly review of the best mystery stories of the year anthology, 'The Interrogator and Other Criminally Good Fiction": Unsurprisingly, there’s not a dud in the bunch; surprisingly, the best entry may be a comic riff on Rex Stout—Dave Zeltserman’s “Archie’s Been Framed.”
6) "I love these stories" Timothy Hallinan, the author of The Queen of Patpong
7) "Julius Katz mysteries are some of the most fun you will ever have reading detective short fiction" David Cramner
8) "It's a nifty change-of-pace for the usually hard-boiled Dave Zeltserman. Clever, sophisticated and witty." Paul Levine, author of Flesh & Bones
9) "I'm a big fan, along with many other people, of Dave Zeltserman's character Julius Katz." Ed Gorman
10) "I think that Zeltserman’s done something really clever here. He’s taken a well-trodden path and then gone on a major and rather original detour." Nigel Bird
1) Shamus and Derringer award-winning 'Julius Katz'
2) Ellery Queen's Readers Choice Award-winner 'Archie's Been Framed'
3) Ellery Queen's Readers Choice Award-winner 'Archie Solves the Case'
4) Never before published novella 'Julius Katz and the Case of a Sliced Ham'
5) From Publisher's Weekly review of the best mystery stories of the year anthology, 'The Interrogator and Other Criminally Good Fiction": Unsurprisingly, there’s not a dud in the bunch; surprisingly, the best entry may be a comic riff on Rex Stout—Dave Zeltserman’s “Archie’s Been Framed.”
6) "I love these stories" Timothy Hallinan, the author of The Queen of Patpong
7) "Julius Katz mysteries are some of the most fun you will ever have reading detective short fiction" David Cramner
8) "It's a nifty change-of-pace for the usually hard-boiled Dave Zeltserman. Clever, sophisticated and witty." Paul Levine, author of Flesh & Bones
9) "I'm a big fan, along with many other people, of Dave Zeltserman's character Julius Katz." Ed Gorman
10) "I think that Zeltserman’s done something really clever here. He’s taken a well-trodden path and then gone on a major and rather original detour." Nigel Bird
Thursday, December 4, 2014
The Julius Katz Collection Giveaway!
Goodreads Book Giveaway
The Julius Katz Collection
by Dave Zeltserman
Giveaway ends December 10, 2014.
See the giveaway details at Goodreads.
Sunday, November 30, 2014
Julius Katz and the Case of a Sliced Ham
In the new novella, Julius Katz and the Case of a Sliced Ham (included The Julius Katz Collection), the ham in question is an actor who was stabbed to death. Given that murder occurred during theater rehearsals, the culprit has to be either the director or one of the four other actors in the production. With no useful evidence, Julius is left having to try squeeze the truth from a group of professional liars in order to catch the murderer, making this his most challenging case yet!
Along with this novella, all six previously published Julius Katz stories have been included in the collection, giving readers a Shamus, Derringer, and two Ellery Queen Readers Choice award-winning stories, along with 350 fun and enjoyable pages of Julius and his very unusual sidekick, Archie.
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
My keynote speech for the Bouchercon Nero Wolfe Banquet
Rex Stout has long been one of my
favorite authors, and it was an honor to be able to give the keynote speech at
the Bouchercon Nero Wolfe Banquet, and meet Mr. Stout's daughter, Rebecca Stout Bradbury. The dinner itself was a fun and lively affair. The
toasts that were offered were imaginative and well-researched by true Wolfeans,
and Weronance (emcee) Ira Matetsky kept things moving quickly with the wit of a
Catskills comedian.
Below is the keynote speech that I
gave--and nobody pelted me with dinner rolls! (of course, they were all eaten
by the time I gave my speech!!)
The
Curious Case of Mr. Katz, Mr. Wolfe, and Two Archies
I’ve been invited to talk here tonight because of my
Julius Katz mysteries which Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine have been publishing.
Even if you didn’t know that Julius’s assistant in these stories is named
Archie, it should be no surprise given the name of my detective that these
mysteries are an unabashed pastiche of Nero Wolfe. My talk tonight will be
comparing Julius Katz with Wolfe and my Archie with Archie Goodwin. I
don’t expect for us to glean any great insights from my talk, but I hope these
comparisons help illuminate some of the qualities that we enjoy so much from
Stout’s Nero Wolfe books.
I am by no means a Wolfean scholar, but I have spent
100s of highly enjoyable hours visiting Nero Wolfe and Archie Goodwin. I first
discovered Nero Wolfe as a teenager when I bought a dog-eared copy of
Fer-de-Lance from a used bookstore. What hooked me was the ingenuity and
cleverness of Stout’s writing, but what drove me to keep searching out more of
the Nero Wolfe books was how much I enjoyed spending time with the characters,
even Lieutenant Rowcliff. I’d like to offer the following quote from Donald
Westlake, which sums up my own feelings:
“I go there to see my old friends and watch Archie
be archly secretive about his sex life and hear Wolfe say, ‘Pfui.’”
By the time I entered college I had read maybe a
quarter of the Wolfe books, and I soon discovered that my university’s library
had a full collection. My grades suffered my first year as I couldn’t help
myself from devouring all the rest of the books in the series. What made this
especially a treat—and maybe some of you might’ve had a similar experience—was
discovering notes left in the margins by other Wolfe fans. Since college
I’ve reread my favorite Wolfe books at different times, have read everything
else I’ve been able to find from Stout, and loved the A&E series starring
Maury Chaykin and Timothy Hutton. I mention this so people here understand that
while I’m not a Nero Wolfe expert, I am a fan, and while there are few writers
who can match Stout’s talent, and I’m certainly not claiming to be one of them,
it was nonetheless important to me to take great care in trying to
duplicate for my Julius Katz series the enjoyment that I experienced reading
all those Nero Wolfe books.
Now to the subject at hand. Both Julius and Wolfe
live in brownstones, Wolfe’s is located at West 35th Street in
Manhattan, Julius’s in the Beacon Hill section of Boston. Both detectives
are brilliant, display some eccentricities, and have lazy tendencies where they
prefer other pursuits than being actively engaged as a detective. Both have
expensive lifestyles. Both have discerning palates where they not only enjoy,
but demand fine food. Wolfe’s beverage of choice is beer, Julius’s wine. Both
are gracious hosts. Both enjoy the comfort of their homes. Both have strict
requirements in how they choose to live their lives, Wolfe more so than Julius.
Both live refined lifestyles, again more so with Wolfe than with Julius.
Wolfe’s hobby is orchids, Julius’s is collecting wines. Both have a nemesis on
the police force named Cramer. In Nero Wolfe’s case, it’s Inspector Cramer, in
Julius’s case, it’s Detective Mark Cramer. Both Cramers often suspect that the
private detective in question is pulling a fast one on them, and withholding
critical information. Both Cramers also begrudgingly respect the private
detective in question. Both Wolfe and Julius at times hire freelance
detectives. In Wolfe’s case, these detectives are Saul Panzer, Fred Durkin and
Orrie Cather. In Julius’s case, they’re Saul Penzer, Tom Durkin, and Willie
Cather. Both Wolfe and Julius have assistants named Archie.
Now for some differences. Wolfe is in his
mid-fifties and weighs one-seventh of a ton. Unless he’s in training to kill
Germans in World War II, his idea of exercise is throwing darts. Julius is 42,
weighs less than one-eleventh of a ton, is handsome, very fit, holds a
fifth degree black belt in Shaolin Kung Fu, and spends two hours every
morning engaged in rigorous exercise. While Wolfe might be occasionally charmed
by a woman, he has no intention of becoming involved with one, or ever letting
a woman live under his roof. Julius is a notorious womanizer—or was until he
meets Lily Rosten in the first of the Julius Katz stories—and becomes smitten
by her, and dates her throughout the rest of the stories, at least so far.
Wolfe rarely leaves his home, and while Julius has cultivated a similar image,
he often leaves his home to dine at fine restaurants and to gamble, but like
Wolfe, prefers not to leave his home for anything work-related. Wolfe employs a
chef, Fritz Brenner, Julius does his own cooking. Finally, Julius’s true
passions are very different than Wolfe’s; namely: Lily Rosten, wine, and
gambling—he’s an expert poker player, and will often use bluffs and his skill
at reading a player’s tell in his detective work.
Now for the two Archie’s in question. Archie
Goodwin, along with being Nero Wolfe’s assistant, also performs a number of
other tasks, including doing Wolfe’s bookkeeping and banking, typing Wolfe’s
correspondences, and keeping the germination and other records for Wolfe’s
orchids. His primary job, though, is detective work, and he’s very good at it.
Tough, tenacious, and a keen observer who has the ability to report
conversations verbatim, Goodwin is more than capable, although he accepts that
Wolfe is the genius, and that his job is to assist, and occasionally to pester
when Wolfe needs prodding. Goodwin is also fiercely loyal to Wolfe. In many
ways Julius’s Archie is very similar to Archie Goodwin. He’s fiercely loyal to
Julius, and pesters Julius when he feels it’s necessary. Along with being
Julius’s assistant, he performs a number of other tasks, including being
Julius’s accountant, wine purchaser, secretary, and all around man Friday. Just
as Goodwin will collect information for Wolfe, Julius’s Archie does the same,
except instead of going out into the field to do this and flashing shoe
leather, Julius’s Archie collects the information over the Internet, usually by
hacking into computer sites. One way in which they’re very different, is that
Julius’s Archie isn’t human. Instead this Archie is a two-inch rectangle piece
of advanced technology complete with audio and visual circuitry and a
self-adapting neuron network. All the great 20th century detective
novels, including the complete Nero Wolfe works, were loaded into his knowledge
base leaving this Archie with the heart and soul of a hardboiled private eye.
Since Julius wears him as a tie clip, he has a very different self-image of
himself than say Goodwin—picturing himself as only five foot tall, which is his
distance from the ground when Julius is standing.
Other than having an image of himself as a human,
Archie is very self-aware, and understands that Julius named him Archie as an
inside-joke—that he is destined to also being the second banana, always to be
one step behind his boss in solving a case, and this brings up yet another way
in which Julius’s Archie is very different than Goodwin—he badly wants to beat
Julius to the punch in solving a case, and believes if he observes Julius in
action enough times, he can keep refining his adaptive reasoning module and
knowledge base so that he can accomplish this.
One final way that Julius’s Archie is very different than Goodwin is that when Goodwin is pestering Wolfe, there’s not much Wolfe can do about it, except to threaten to fire him, which I can’t remember ever happening. Julius, though, always has the option of turning his Archie off.
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
The Julius Katz Collection
The Julius Katz Collection is now available as a 350-page paperback and kindle download. This collection has the first 6 Julius Katz mysteries that were originally published in Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine and have so far won a Shamus, Derringer and 2 Ellery Queen Readers Choice awards, and an original 22,000 word novella, Julius Katz and the Case of a Sliced Ham. If you haven't discovered these charming, fun, and audience-pleasing mysteries yet featuring Boston's most eccentric, brilliant, and laziest detective and his very unusual sidekick, Archie, now's your chance!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










